Skip to main content

Film Review: Calvary

A quiet, sad and poignant character study about victimhood and the consequences of evil acts, yet at its heart there is a sweetness that helps offset the darkness. Brendan Gleeson plays the local catholic priest in a very quiet but powerful performance. The film opens with him in the confessional booth receiving a death threat from the other man in the booth, someone local whom he knows yet cannot see.

The following seven days leading to the priest’s execution track him as he appears to take stock of the situation in his community and what comes to light is a feeling of loss, of a way of life that is disappearing and the uncertain future that lies ahead. In many ways it reminded me thematically of Hell or High Water in the way it depicts that sorrow of things lost that you never really appreciated while they were yours.

The motivation for the killer is a sort of revenge for the crimes of the catholic church in Ireland which he personally suffered from. Throughout the film there is a real sense of rejection from people who historically would have been warm toward clergy, as Gleeson’s character faces constant disrespect and scorn. He feels the weight of the crimes committed by his brethren, but he himself is forever open and generous. He struck me as more of a community psychiatrist than a holy man, which I think is really the true function of priesthood, not the political maneuvering, the graft, the corruption and the inhuman crimes that the catholic church is known for.

The title is poignant, recalling the place of Christ’s crucifixion and presenting Gleeson’s character as a sort of stand-in for JC, a sacrificial lamb, an innocent murdered so as to alleviate the injustice of the world. Interesting stuff.

The film is shot beautifully, taking in the picaresque Irish coastline, and it is populated by interesting characters, some of whom border dangerously on parody, but all with some kind of deeper character grounding than you might expect. There are moments of surprising emotion as well as shocking violence, but that feels consistent with the tone of the story, which is about how people cope with horrible events. Everyone has something in their past, including institutions such as the church.


I thought it was a really good movie. It stayed with me for quite a while after it wrapped and I kept thinking about the themes and the situations presented. It’s a little uneven and there are some parts where the film treads a bit close to sentimentality, but it pays for them with darker moments which on the whole balanced out, in my opinion. I thought Brendan Gleeson was terrific, as was the supporting cast, and the movie had some great imagery. I would see it again.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: Blade Runner 2049

Denis Villeneuve has succeeded in creating that rarest of films: a very late sequel that respects and improves upon the original. Blade Runner 2049 expands the canvas of the first film with new locations and characters, all of whom feel authentic and true to the tone and themes of 1982’s Blade Runner . I thought it was magnificent in terms of setting and imagery and it packed an unexpected emotional punch which was absent in the first movie. I wanted to see it twice before I wrote my review and I am confident in saying it is superior to the original film while remaining tonally and esthetically consistent. I loved it. Foremost, I loved the story – complex without being hard to follow and never violating any continuity laid down by its predecessor. There were plot twists I could see coming but then the revelation would have more dimension than I was expecting. There were also genuine surprises in a couple of scenes. The cast is wonderful, with everyone well-suited to their roles (...

Oscars

For the first time that I can remember, I have seen all but one of the nominees for the Oscars, which were held last week. At the time, I had seen all of them except for The Post and The Shape of Water , which I finally saw after it won best picture. My thoughts on it and the rest of the nominees: The Shape of Water is essentially Splash re-imagined with the Creature from the Black Lagoon instead of a mermaid, but nowhere near as good. I was impressed by the creature design, certainly, but the rest of the movie felt frustratingly underdone. It was a very typical Guillermo del Toro film, in that sense: I think he’s a gifted visualist, but his stories and characters leave a lot to be desired. Get Out is actually my third favourite movie of 2018, behind mother! and Blade Runner 2049 , so if I had been an Academy voter, this is the one I personally would have chosen for best picture. It’s very smart, very funny and very poignant without being preachy. It’s really brilliant,...

IPO Statement

This weekly blog is intended (like most people’s) to be a space where I can talk about the things I’m interested in. I’ll be using it to post critical reviews of movies, books and whatever else I might want to unload my mind about. In general, I’m going to keep things as positive as I can because there’s already enough negativity out there and I would rather spend time focusing on the things I like rather than the things that upset me. I am a rational anarchist. I believe nobody has any right to tell anyone else what to do, but that the limits of anarchy make it unworkable in groups larger than a hundred or so individuals. I think with this many people around, impersonal rules are an unfortunate necessity, but I will only respect the ones that seem fair, in my mind. There is no excuse for injustice or abuse of power and as people and populations change, so must the rules that govern us, meaning they should always be challenged or at least suspected. Art and culture are my pass...