Skip to main content

Art vs. Artist

They say you should never meet your heroes because you’ll likely be disappointed. This is sound advice because while art is a realization of ideals, artists are human beings full of flaws and contradictions. It is also a mistake to equate the art with the artist because the artist cannot be fully responsible for the way the art is received – the audience always has its own filter of prejudice and preoccupation. It would seem the less you know about the creator of something, the better you can enjoy it on its own merits, but I don’t value ignorance and find it helpful to understand what may be informing the artist’s choices. Keeping everything in perspective is the key to balancing the equation.

I’m sure everyone has had some experience of idolizing someone, be it a movie star or singer or athlete, only to learn some unseemly detail of their private lives that forever taints the way they look at them. For myself, I have problems watching Mel Gibson in movies because of things he has said in the past. The thing is he’s not the only one who has a shitty side and I’m sure if I looked closer at any handful of celebrities whose work I admire I would find plenty to object to. People who are completely agreeable are also completely unremarkable.

Furthermore, almost any entertainment is a collaborative effort. No single person is totally responsible for the final product, unless we’re talking about the true lone creator (like a sculptor or a painter, for instance). What the audience receives is subject to all kinds of variables, from the input of the contributors to the happenstance and accidents surrounding its production. Above all, however, art is less about communication than revelation: presenting an ideal artifice upon which the audience can project its psyche and discover personal truths, which may or may not have anything to do with the artist’s intent.

A sophisticated artist can influence the direction of the audience’s thinking, certainly, but a sophisticated audience should be equally aware of the tools and tricks of the artist’s trade and spot a lie when it contradicts the truth as they understand it. Art, like a good story, has to have an internal logic in order for it to carry any sort of meaning. Otherwise, all you have is sound and fury signifying nothing. Knowing the influences that go into any art will help to decode it, but only to a point. Don’t lose sight of the forest for the trees.


It’s also important to keep in mind that art is a lie in service of the truth. The people behind it may or may not fully believe what they are saying. Like a magician, making you wonder is the point of the exercise. While it’s important to know what shaped the creation of any art, it is the art and your relation to it that matters more than the creators. Know thyself. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: Blade Runner 2049

Denis Villeneuve has succeeded in creating that rarest of films: a very late sequel that respects and improves upon the original. Blade Runner 2049 expands the canvas of the first film with new locations and characters, all of whom feel authentic and true to the tone and themes of 1982’s Blade Runner . I thought it was magnificent in terms of setting and imagery and it packed an unexpected emotional punch which was absent in the first movie. I wanted to see it twice before I wrote my review and I am confident in saying it is superior to the original film while remaining tonally and esthetically consistent. I loved it. Foremost, I loved the story – complex without being hard to follow and never violating any continuity laid down by its predecessor. There were plot twists I could see coming but then the revelation would have more dimension than I was expecting. There were also genuine surprises in a couple of scenes. The cast is wonderful, with everyone well-suited to their roles (...

Oscars

For the first time that I can remember, I have seen all but one of the nominees for the Oscars, which were held last week. At the time, I had seen all of them except for The Post and The Shape of Water , which I finally saw after it won best picture. My thoughts on it and the rest of the nominees: The Shape of Water is essentially Splash re-imagined with the Creature from the Black Lagoon instead of a mermaid, but nowhere near as good. I was impressed by the creature design, certainly, but the rest of the movie felt frustratingly underdone. It was a very typical Guillermo del Toro film, in that sense: I think he’s a gifted visualist, but his stories and characters leave a lot to be desired. Get Out is actually my third favourite movie of 2018, behind mother! and Blade Runner 2049 , so if I had been an Academy voter, this is the one I personally would have chosen for best picture. It’s very smart, very funny and very poignant without being preachy. It’s really brilliant,...

IPO Statement

This weekly blog is intended (like most people’s) to be a space where I can talk about the things I’m interested in. I’ll be using it to post critical reviews of movies, books and whatever else I might want to unload my mind about. In general, I’m going to keep things as positive as I can because there’s already enough negativity out there and I would rather spend time focusing on the things I like rather than the things that upset me. I am a rational anarchist. I believe nobody has any right to tell anyone else what to do, but that the limits of anarchy make it unworkable in groups larger than a hundred or so individuals. I think with this many people around, impersonal rules are an unfortunate necessity, but I will only respect the ones that seem fair, in my mind. There is no excuse for injustice or abuse of power and as people and populations change, so must the rules that govern us, meaning they should always be challenged or at least suspected. Art and culture are my pass...