Skip to main content

Art vs. Artist

They say you should never meet your heroes because you’ll likely be disappointed. This is sound advice because while art is a realization of ideals, artists are human beings full of flaws and contradictions. It is also a mistake to equate the art with the artist because the artist cannot be fully responsible for the way the art is received – the audience always has its own filter of prejudice and preoccupation. It would seem the less you know about the creator of something, the better you can enjoy it on its own merits, but I don’t value ignorance and find it helpful to understand what may be informing the artist’s choices. Keeping everything in perspective is the key to balancing the equation.

I’m sure everyone has had some experience of idolizing someone, be it a movie star or singer or athlete, only to learn some unseemly detail of their private lives that forever taints the way they look at them. For myself, I have problems watching Mel Gibson in movies because of things he has said in the past. The thing is he’s not the only one who has a shitty side and I’m sure if I looked closer at any handful of celebrities whose work I admire I would find plenty to object to. People who are completely agreeable are also completely unremarkable.

Furthermore, almost any entertainment is a collaborative effort. No single person is totally responsible for the final product, unless we’re talking about the true lone creator (like a sculptor or a painter, for instance). What the audience receives is subject to all kinds of variables, from the input of the contributors to the happenstance and accidents surrounding its production. Above all, however, art is less about communication than revelation: presenting an ideal artifice upon which the audience can project its psyche and discover personal truths, which may or may not have anything to do with the artist’s intent.

A sophisticated artist can influence the direction of the audience’s thinking, certainly, but a sophisticated audience should be equally aware of the tools and tricks of the artist’s trade and spot a lie when it contradicts the truth as they understand it. Art, like a good story, has to have an internal logic in order for it to carry any sort of meaning. Otherwise, all you have is sound and fury signifying nothing. Knowing the influences that go into any art will help to decode it, but only to a point. Don’t lose sight of the forest for the trees.


It’s also important to keep in mind that art is a lie in service of the truth. The people behind it may or may not fully believe what they are saying. Like a magician, making you wonder is the point of the exercise. While it’s important to know what shaped the creation of any art, it is the art and your relation to it that matters more than the creators. Know thyself. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review - Annihilation

Alex Garland, writer/director of Ex Machina , delivers another mature sci-fi film, this time about a platoon of scientist-soldiers sent in to investigate an area surrounding some kind of meteorite that is impenetrable to all scans and observations. Natalie Portman leads the all-female cast on a journey into surreal landscapes as they search for whatever lies at the heart of this zone called “the shimmer” and things take weirder and darker turns as the film progresses. I found a lot to like in the writing and the visual design of the film and I would have to say it’s good, but not great. First of all, I really do love the esthetics of the movie, very colourful and pretty but also very creepy and unsettling sometimes. The film has a nicely strange tone, approximating the constant disorientation the characters are subject to while inside the shimmer, with everything taking on a quasi-hallucinogenic prismatic aura. There is a lot of gory violence but I thought it appropriate to the s...

Film Review - Tully

Writer Diablo Cody and director Jason Reitman team up once again for what amounts to a really great and unusual depiction of motherhood and how it can consume one’s identity. I found it to be honest, direct and heartfelt while also deftly avoiding cliché. It’s not a perfect film, but its flaws are tiny compared to its achievements and I would definitely see it again. Charlize Theron plays Marlo, an exhausted mother of three who is losing her mind trying to keep up with a newborn baby and a son labelled “quirky” by school staff, while her eldest daughter seems to be fairly capable of looking after herself (nice, given the challenges of the other two, but not entirely true). Her husband, Drew (Ron Livingston), struggles to make his career work and spends a lot of time on the road. Seeing her stressed out all the time, Marlo’s brother Craig (the always fun Mark Duplass) hires a “night nanny” for her so she can at least get a good night’s sleep while someone else monitors the kids. M...

Film Review - A Quiet Place

John Krasinski directs and stars with his wife Emily Blunt in this exceptional horror movie about a family trying to survive against predatory monsters who hunt by sound. The film is a terrific example of visual storytelling as the dialogue is suppressed to a minimum by the danger it represents to the survivors. It is also one of the most effective and high-tension suspense movies I’ve ever seen, with more intelligence and emotional power than are typical of the genre. The story begins several months after some sort of invasion by ill-defined, poorly understood but immensely superior predators which have effectively wiped out the human race. Those who have managed to survive have had to adapt to a virtually silent mode of living, walking barefoot everywhere, for example, or communicating by sign language. The eldest daughter, played by Millicent Simmonds, is indeed deaf herself, and the film uses its sound design very effectively to convey point of view of characters according to...