Skip to main content

Film Review: mother!

Darren Aronofsky is one of my favourite filmmakers, an artist working in the mainstream but always testing its boundaries. His movies don’t always succeed with me, but even when they fail they are interesting. His latest, mother!, is probably my favourite movie of 2017 because it is simultaneously familiar and bizarre, a surrealist and highly symbological critique of humanity, complex, coded and dark as pitch.

The movie most definitely does not take place in reality as we know it, operating instead by an intense dream-logic which starts out somewhat stifling and becomes more and more oppressive as the situation deteriorates. The point of view is entirely Jennifer Lawrence’s as the camera is with her at every moment, on her face or looking over her shoulder. She lives in a big house in the country with her husband, played by Javier Bardem, far away from anywhere. She is a happy homemaker and he is a poet with writer’s block. One day a stranger, played by Ed Harris, comes knocking on the door and he is but the first of what ultimately turns out to be multitudes by the film’s unhinged final moments as it plays out a home invasion story in wildly twisted ways.

The film is heavily coded and up to the viewers to interpret for themselves, but based on the events of the story and hearing other critics’ analyses, I think I have a good grasp of what Aronofsky may have been communicating. A significant point is that none of the characters appear to have names. Reading the credits, which are all in lower case, only Javier Bardem’s character is capitalized, listed as “Him”, from which I infer he is God, Jennifer Lawrence is Nature, the house is planet Earth, and all the people who keep showing up at the house are the endlessly replicating masses of humanity, starting small and quasi-biblical at first but eventually growing to overwhelming numbers.

The movie is dark, and I mean pitch black. There are some insanely grotesque images paraded through the house in the second half and there is one scene in particular which genuinely shocked me, and for a viewer as jaded and desensitized as me to say that takes a lot. I loved how uncompromising the movie was in its apparent (to me) critique of religion, both of god and of cults, and the mass hysteria and irresponsibility of human beings in large numbers. There is a real feeling of rage and despair coming through the movie which feels like a parable for how we are treating the Earth and the verdict is not good. The ending of the film builds on a subplot which is obscure and subtle but I believe points to the truth of scientific inquiry revealing the operating systems of the universe, only to what end? In this instance it does not look good, that human beings are damned to repeat their mistakes, but there might also be a glimmer of hope that things could be different next time.


Well done, Darren Aranofsky. In my opinion, the film mother! is the most intense, deep, dark and surprising movie of the year. Definitely my kind of film.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: Blade Runner 2049

Denis Villeneuve has succeeded in creating that rarest of films: a very late sequel that respects and improves upon the original. Blade Runner 2049 expands the canvas of the first film with new locations and characters, all of whom feel authentic and true to the tone and themes of 1982’s Blade Runner . I thought it was magnificent in terms of setting and imagery and it packed an unexpected emotional punch which was absent in the first movie. I wanted to see it twice before I wrote my review and I am confident in saying it is superior to the original film while remaining tonally and esthetically consistent. I loved it. Foremost, I loved the story – complex without being hard to follow and never violating any continuity laid down by its predecessor. There were plot twists I could see coming but then the revelation would have more dimension than I was expecting. There were also genuine surprises in a couple of scenes. The cast is wonderful, with everyone well-suited to their roles (...

Oscars

For the first time that I can remember, I have seen all but one of the nominees for the Oscars, which were held last week. At the time, I had seen all of them except for The Post and The Shape of Water , which I finally saw after it won best picture. My thoughts on it and the rest of the nominees: The Shape of Water is essentially Splash re-imagined with the Creature from the Black Lagoon instead of a mermaid, but nowhere near as good. I was impressed by the creature design, certainly, but the rest of the movie felt frustratingly underdone. It was a very typical Guillermo del Toro film, in that sense: I think he’s a gifted visualist, but his stories and characters leave a lot to be desired. Get Out is actually my third favourite movie of 2018, behind mother! and Blade Runner 2049 , so if I had been an Academy voter, this is the one I personally would have chosen for best picture. It’s very smart, very funny and very poignant without being preachy. It’s really brilliant,...

IPO Statement

This weekly blog is intended (like most people’s) to be a space where I can talk about the things I’m interested in. I’ll be using it to post critical reviews of movies, books and whatever else I might want to unload my mind about. In general, I’m going to keep things as positive as I can because there’s already enough negativity out there and I would rather spend time focusing on the things I like rather than the things that upset me. I am a rational anarchist. I believe nobody has any right to tell anyone else what to do, but that the limits of anarchy make it unworkable in groups larger than a hundred or so individuals. I think with this many people around, impersonal rules are an unfortunate necessity, but I will only respect the ones that seem fair, in my mind. There is no excuse for injustice or abuse of power and as people and populations change, so must the rules that govern us, meaning they should always be challenged or at least suspected. Art and culture are my pass...