Skip to main content

Review - Thor: Ragnarok

I saw Thor: Ragnarok last weekend and had a fun time. I enjoyed its playful tone and sense of humour. In general, I have found Marvel movies to be formulaic product and the only reason I would go see one is to see actors I enjoy and/or a director who I like. Doctor Strange is a good example of the former and Thor: Ragnarok the latter because I was curious to see what Taika Waititi (What We Do in the Shadows) would do with Marvel. And, like Doctor Strange, I was not disappointed.

First of all, the film is very colourful. Relentless eye candy is how I would describe the bulk of the film as it takes place on Sakkar, a planet-scale garbage dump ruled by Grandmaster, played wonderfully by Jeff Goldblum. That’s his name, by the way, not a title, like “Such-and-Such, the Grandmaster”. He introduces himself with “My name is Grandmaster”, which I found hilarious. The movie does not take itself seriously at all, which is not to say it’s all goofs and gags but it is very light in tone and a fun time for sure.

The film is saturated with an early-80’s feel. I found the sets highly reminiscent of the Buck Rogers tv show that ran from 1979 to 1981 and the music is all frenetic synths and keyboards which made me think it sounded a lot like Devo. Imagine my surprise when I read Mark Mothersbaugh’s name in the credits for the music!

I do have a couple of complaints about the film, however. Although I love Cate Blanchett and enjoyed seeing her on screen as Hella, the Goddess of Death, I didn’t care much for the stuff happening in Asgard and found it all a bit second-rate Lord of the Rings. It also felt a bit nonsensical to have endless melee combat with her when it is said and shown numerous times that she is unbeatable.  

My biggest issue with the movie is how they treated Bruce Banner, who has been stuck on Sakkar as the Hulk for two years – a fact he is rightly astonished and concerned about, saying that if Hulk could be in charge for that long then it’s entirely possible that if he changes into Hulk again, he might not be able to change back at all. It’s a very valid point and played well by Mark Ruffalo. Yet at the climax of the film he changes so that he can join the big brawl, despite the fact that he has seven PhD’s and should therefore have been able to figure out some way around it. It’s that over-reliance on violence as a solution and an almost anti-intellectual attitude at the core of Marvel movies that always bothers me.  


Setting all that aside, however, I still would recommend the movie as an enjoyable diversion for a couple of hours. Jeff Goldblum always makes things sweeter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Retro Review - Paris, Texas (1984)

As a preteen I was obsessed with ALIEN and always took note of everyone involved, including the actors. Harry Dean Stanton’s most oft-mentioned film credits were always either ALIEN or Paris, Texas , so when he died last year I made a point of finally hunting down the latter which had been on my radar as long as my obsession with the former. I knew very little about the film, so when the opening credits said “written by Sam Shepard” I immediately became more interested. Then “directed by Wim Wenders” came up on screen and I was even more interested. I was pretty confident I was going to have a very good film experience. I was wrong only in that it exceeded my expectations. Paris, Texas is, in my opinion, beautiful, authentic, heart-felt, compassionate, moving and very mature: a great movie, in other words. The movie opens with Travis (Harry Dean Stanton) walking aimlessly through the deserts of Texas, apparently in some kind of mute daze. A local doctor finds him and a bus...

Film Review - A Quiet Place

John Krasinski directs and stars with his wife Emily Blunt in this exceptional horror movie about a family trying to survive against predatory monsters who hunt by sound. The film is a terrific example of visual storytelling as the dialogue is suppressed to a minimum by the danger it represents to the survivors. It is also one of the most effective and high-tension suspense movies I’ve ever seen, with more intelligence and emotional power than are typical of the genre. The story begins several months after some sort of invasion by ill-defined, poorly understood but immensely superior predators which have effectively wiped out the human race. Those who have managed to survive have had to adapt to a virtually silent mode of living, walking barefoot everywhere, for example, or communicating by sign language. The eldest daughter, played by Millicent Simmonds, is indeed deaf herself, and the film uses its sound design very effectively to convey point of view of characters according to...

Film Review - Tomb Raider

Alicia Vikander is the best and possibly only reason to see this movie. I’m not expecting Shakespeare from a film based on a video game, but I am expecting more action than dialogue. I liked the action sequences alright, but I don’t think there were enough of them, and the stuff between them I felt was kind of boring. Still, I did like seeing Alicia Vikander running and jumping and doing action-stuff, so the movie wasn’t a complete loss. I just wouldn’t recommend it. The film sets out to be an origin story for Lara Croft and a search for her lost father which is bound up in a lame Raiders of the Lost Ark –type race for a powerful magical maguffin. I really don’t mind the predictability of the plot, and there is an argument to be made that these kinds of movies are all about delivering what the audience expects, but I don’t want to put up with long, melodramatic scenes or boring expository speeches. I want to see Lara Croft raiding tombs. Alicia Vikander does a superb job wit...