Skip to main content

Review - Thor: Ragnarok

I saw Thor: Ragnarok last weekend and had a fun time. I enjoyed its playful tone and sense of humour. In general, I have found Marvel movies to be formulaic product and the only reason I would go see one is to see actors I enjoy and/or a director who I like. Doctor Strange is a good example of the former and Thor: Ragnarok the latter because I was curious to see what Taika Waititi (What We Do in the Shadows) would do with Marvel. And, like Doctor Strange, I was not disappointed.

First of all, the film is very colourful. Relentless eye candy is how I would describe the bulk of the film as it takes place on Sakkar, a planet-scale garbage dump ruled by Grandmaster, played wonderfully by Jeff Goldblum. That’s his name, by the way, not a title, like “Such-and-Such, the Grandmaster”. He introduces himself with “My name is Grandmaster”, which I found hilarious. The movie does not take itself seriously at all, which is not to say it’s all goofs and gags but it is very light in tone and a fun time for sure.

The film is saturated with an early-80’s feel. I found the sets highly reminiscent of the Buck Rogers tv show that ran from 1979 to 1981 and the music is all frenetic synths and keyboards which made me think it sounded a lot like Devo. Imagine my surprise when I read Mark Mothersbaugh’s name in the credits for the music!

I do have a couple of complaints about the film, however. Although I love Cate Blanchett and enjoyed seeing her on screen as Hella, the Goddess of Death, I didn’t care much for the stuff happening in Asgard and found it all a bit second-rate Lord of the Rings. It also felt a bit nonsensical to have endless melee combat with her when it is said and shown numerous times that she is unbeatable.  

My biggest issue with the movie is how they treated Bruce Banner, who has been stuck on Sakkar as the Hulk for two years – a fact he is rightly astonished and concerned about, saying that if Hulk could be in charge for that long then it’s entirely possible that if he changes into Hulk again, he might not be able to change back at all. It’s a very valid point and played well by Mark Ruffalo. Yet at the climax of the film he changes so that he can join the big brawl, despite the fact that he has seven PhD’s and should therefore have been able to figure out some way around it. It’s that over-reliance on violence as a solution and an almost anti-intellectual attitude at the core of Marvel movies that always bothers me.  


Setting all that aside, however, I still would recommend the movie as an enjoyable diversion for a couple of hours. Jeff Goldblum always makes things sweeter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: Blade Runner 2049

Denis Villeneuve has succeeded in creating that rarest of films: a very late sequel that respects and improves upon the original. Blade Runner 2049 expands the canvas of the first film with new locations and characters, all of whom feel authentic and true to the tone and themes of 1982’s Blade Runner . I thought it was magnificent in terms of setting and imagery and it packed an unexpected emotional punch which was absent in the first movie. I wanted to see it twice before I wrote my review and I am confident in saying it is superior to the original film while remaining tonally and esthetically consistent. I loved it. Foremost, I loved the story – complex without being hard to follow and never violating any continuity laid down by its predecessor. There were plot twists I could see coming but then the revelation would have more dimension than I was expecting. There were also genuine surprises in a couple of scenes. The cast is wonderful, with everyone well-suited to their roles (...

Oscars

For the first time that I can remember, I have seen all but one of the nominees for the Oscars, which were held last week. At the time, I had seen all of them except for The Post and The Shape of Water , which I finally saw after it won best picture. My thoughts on it and the rest of the nominees: The Shape of Water is essentially Splash re-imagined with the Creature from the Black Lagoon instead of a mermaid, but nowhere near as good. I was impressed by the creature design, certainly, but the rest of the movie felt frustratingly underdone. It was a very typical Guillermo del Toro film, in that sense: I think he’s a gifted visualist, but his stories and characters leave a lot to be desired. Get Out is actually my third favourite movie of 2018, behind mother! and Blade Runner 2049 , so if I had been an Academy voter, this is the one I personally would have chosen for best picture. It’s very smart, very funny and very poignant without being preachy. It’s really brilliant,...

IPO Statement

This weekly blog is intended (like most people’s) to be a space where I can talk about the things I’m interested in. I’ll be using it to post critical reviews of movies, books and whatever else I might want to unload my mind about. In general, I’m going to keep things as positive as I can because there’s already enough negativity out there and I would rather spend time focusing on the things I like rather than the things that upset me. I am a rational anarchist. I believe nobody has any right to tell anyone else what to do, but that the limits of anarchy make it unworkable in groups larger than a hundred or so individuals. I think with this many people around, impersonal rules are an unfortunate necessity, but I will only respect the ones that seem fair, in my mind. There is no excuse for injustice or abuse of power and as people and populations change, so must the rules that govern us, meaning they should always be challenged or at least suspected. Art and culture are my pass...