Skip to main content

Adaptations

I recently re-read Watchmen by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons and it made me think about adaptations and how important it may or may not be to remain faithful to the source material. Along with V for Vendetta, the two comic book works written by Moore have been adapted into feature films which are poles apart on this issue. For myself, I think it a moot point because I mostly prefer innovation to re-creation.

Watchmen and V for Vendetta are great examples of different approaches to adaptation. In the case of the former, slavish devotion to re-creating the source material is the course and, while satisfying the urge to see the characters faithfully brought to life may be nice, the film as a whole feels curiously flat. I do think it’s the best adaptation they could have made, but of something that probably doesn’t translate well into film because it was so specifically designed for and about the subject matter of super-hero comic books. I happen to like the 2009 film adaptation, but I also realize it falls well short of the heights and depths reached by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons.

The 2006 film version of V for Vendetta, on the other hand, hardly resembles the comic book beyond the look of the character V in his Guy Fawkes disguise and the totalitarian-future setting. His behavior and motivations are modified to make him a more palatable hero for mainstream Hollywood audiences and very few of the events in the comic make it to the screen in the same shape. However, I feel that the movie V for Vendetta is a superior film to Watchmen because it has a voice and a soul all its own which I believe is a result of using the source material as an inspiration rather than a roadmap.

There is always the question of how far an adaptation has to stray before it no longer resembles its source material and can no longer claim identification with it. World War Z is a great example of a film adaptation that really only has its premise (zombie apocalypse) and title in common with the book on which it is based. In truth, adaptation is probably not the best word for taking a book or a comic or a tv show and translating it into another medium, such as film. Re-invention would probably be more accurate.


Adaptation in general is tricky, and you can never fully satisfy the demands and desires of fans. I think it’s better to invent something new because it frees you as an artist from having to obey the forms already established. I understand that George Lucas, in putting together the first Star Wars movie, initially tried to get the rights to adapt Flash Gordon, but, when faced with the costs and the creative restrictions, he decided to make something from scratch. I believe our culture has benefitted much more from that decision, as has Mr. Lucas himself. It’s riskier than catering to an established audience, but then the rewards are greater as well.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: Blade Runner 2049

Denis Villeneuve has succeeded in creating that rarest of films: a very late sequel that respects and improves upon the original. Blade Runner 2049 expands the canvas of the first film with new locations and characters, all of whom feel authentic and true to the tone and themes of 1982’s Blade Runner . I thought it was magnificent in terms of setting and imagery and it packed an unexpected emotional punch which was absent in the first movie. I wanted to see it twice before I wrote my review and I am confident in saying it is superior to the original film while remaining tonally and esthetically consistent. I loved it. Foremost, I loved the story – complex without being hard to follow and never violating any continuity laid down by its predecessor. There were plot twists I could see coming but then the revelation would have more dimension than I was expecting. There were also genuine surprises in a couple of scenes. The cast is wonderful, with everyone well-suited to their roles (...
Post a Comment
Read more

Oscars

For the first time that I can remember, I have seen all but one of the nominees for the Oscars, which were held last week. At the time, I had seen all of them except for The Post and The Shape of Water , which I finally saw after it won best picture. My thoughts on it and the rest of the nominees: The Shape of Water is essentially Splash re-imagined with the Creature from the Black Lagoon instead of a mermaid, but nowhere near as good. I was impressed by the creature design, certainly, but the rest of the movie felt frustratingly underdone. It was a very typical Guillermo del Toro film, in that sense: I think he’s a gifted visualist, but his stories and characters leave a lot to be desired. Get Out is actually my third favourite movie of 2018, behind mother! and Blade Runner 2049 , so if I had been an Academy voter, this is the one I personally would have chosen for best picture. It’s very smart, very funny and very poignant without being preachy. It’s really brilliant,...
Post a Comment
Read more

IPO Statement

This weekly blog is intended (like most people’s) to be a space where I can talk about the things I’m interested in. I’ll be using it to post critical reviews of movies, books and whatever else I might want to unload my mind about. In general, I’m going to keep things as positive as I can because there’s already enough negativity out there and I would rather spend time focusing on the things I like rather than the things that upset me. I am a rational anarchist. I believe nobody has any right to tell anyone else what to do, but that the limits of anarchy make it unworkable in groups larger than a hundred or so individuals. I think with this many people around, impersonal rules are an unfortunate necessity, but I will only respect the ones that seem fair, in my mind. There is no excuse for injustice or abuse of power and as people and populations change, so must the rules that govern us, meaning they should always be challenged or at least suspected. Art and culture are my pass...
Post a Comment
Read more