Skip to main content

Science-Fiction & Fantasy

First of all, I believe quality is quality, regardless of genre. I love movies of all kinds, but I have a special interest in science-fiction and fantasy. A great drama or musical will move me as well as anything else, but I like my entertainment to be imaginative. Most of all, I love how easily science-fiction and fantasy lend themselves to allegory and symbolism.

Everyone has their biases. There are types of movies I cleave to and others that I tend to avoid. Quality always shines through, however, and while I may not generally enjoy westerns, for example, I do love Unforgiven. Similarly, musicals leave me cold most of the time, but I can never get tired of Grease. I like movies that transcend the boundaries of their genre; I admire the ambition to try and do something different. I think it’s the inherent challenges involved in mounting science-fiction and fantasy that make me favourably predisposed to anyone willing to try. I’m still ruthless about the whole, though: creation of worlds may be a feat unto itself, but it’s all for naught if the story fails.

I wouldn’t say I like the genres of science-fiction or fantasy per se. However, I do prefer stories that expand the boundaries of my reality and that is more or less what defines them. I like to wonder. I know the world is mundane and that my life is mostly predictable. I also know that, if I had the courage, I could radically alter my life, but it would still be the same world with the same physical laws of nature. I like to think there are other ways of not only living but of existing, and that is what science-fiction and fantasy are all about, at their best.

Of course, while a typical science-fiction story may be set in the future, it’s really about the present. All art is a reflection of its time. What sets science-fiction and fantasy apart from other genres is the capacity for symbolism. You know as soon as Darth Vader walks onto screen in Star Wars that he’s the bad guy; just look at him! For an active mind, it’s fun to try and decode the design work in these kinds of films, though you’re as likely reading into it your own ideas as deciphering the filmmakers’. That revelatory aspect is the essence of any art, but for some reason it comes across most strongly to me in science-fiction and fantasy films.


What I respond to in anything is quality of craft and ingenuity of storytelling. I appreciate most those flights of imagination that transcend expectation and broaden my horizons. I like to have lots of spectacle on screen, which science fiction and fantasy excel at, but I also want to care about why the characters are in conflict, which is where they fall short a lot of the time. When they work, though, there’s nothing as good. I am a devotee of science fiction and fantasy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Retro Review - Paris, Texas (1984)

As a preteen I was obsessed with ALIEN and always took note of everyone involved, including the actors. Harry Dean Stanton’s most oft-mentioned film credits were always either ALIEN or Paris, Texas , so when he died last year I made a point of finally hunting down the latter which had been on my radar as long as my obsession with the former. I knew very little about the film, so when the opening credits said “written by Sam Shepard” I immediately became more interested. Then “directed by Wim Wenders” came up on screen and I was even more interested. I was pretty confident I was going to have a very good film experience. I was wrong only in that it exceeded my expectations. Paris, Texas is, in my opinion, beautiful, authentic, heart-felt, compassionate, moving and very mature: a great movie, in other words. The movie opens with Travis (Harry Dean Stanton) walking aimlessly through the deserts of Texas, apparently in some kind of mute daze. A local doctor finds him and a bus...

Film Review - A Quiet Place

John Krasinski directs and stars with his wife Emily Blunt in this exceptional horror movie about a family trying to survive against predatory monsters who hunt by sound. The film is a terrific example of visual storytelling as the dialogue is suppressed to a minimum by the danger it represents to the survivors. It is also one of the most effective and high-tension suspense movies I’ve ever seen, with more intelligence and emotional power than are typical of the genre. The story begins several months after some sort of invasion by ill-defined, poorly understood but immensely superior predators which have effectively wiped out the human race. Those who have managed to survive have had to adapt to a virtually silent mode of living, walking barefoot everywhere, for example, or communicating by sign language. The eldest daughter, played by Millicent Simmonds, is indeed deaf herself, and the film uses its sound design very effectively to convey point of view of characters according to...

Film Review - Tomb Raider

Alicia Vikander is the best and possibly only reason to see this movie. I’m not expecting Shakespeare from a film based on a video game, but I am expecting more action than dialogue. I liked the action sequences alright, but I don’t think there were enough of them, and the stuff between them I felt was kind of boring. Still, I did like seeing Alicia Vikander running and jumping and doing action-stuff, so the movie wasn’t a complete loss. I just wouldn’t recommend it. The film sets out to be an origin story for Lara Croft and a search for her lost father which is bound up in a lame Raiders of the Lost Ark –type race for a powerful magical maguffin. I really don’t mind the predictability of the plot, and there is an argument to be made that these kinds of movies are all about delivering what the audience expects, but I don’t want to put up with long, melodramatic scenes or boring expository speeches. I want to see Lara Croft raiding tombs. Alicia Vikander does a superb job wit...