Skip to main content

Science-Fiction & Fantasy

First of all, I believe quality is quality, regardless of genre. I love movies of all kinds, but I have a special interest in science-fiction and fantasy. A great drama or musical will move me as well as anything else, but I like my entertainment to be imaginative. Most of all, I love how easily science-fiction and fantasy lend themselves to allegory and symbolism.

Everyone has their biases. There are types of movies I cleave to and others that I tend to avoid. Quality always shines through, however, and while I may not generally enjoy westerns, for example, I do love Unforgiven. Similarly, musicals leave me cold most of the time, but I can never get tired of Grease. I like movies that transcend the boundaries of their genre; I admire the ambition to try and do something different. I think it’s the inherent challenges involved in mounting science-fiction and fantasy that make me favourably predisposed to anyone willing to try. I’m still ruthless about the whole, though: creation of worlds may be a feat unto itself, but it’s all for naught if the story fails.

I wouldn’t say I like the genres of science-fiction or fantasy per se. However, I do prefer stories that expand the boundaries of my reality and that is more or less what defines them. I like to wonder. I know the world is mundane and that my life is mostly predictable. I also know that, if I had the courage, I could radically alter my life, but it would still be the same world with the same physical laws of nature. I like to think there are other ways of not only living but of existing, and that is what science-fiction and fantasy are all about, at their best.

Of course, while a typical science-fiction story may be set in the future, it’s really about the present. All art is a reflection of its time. What sets science-fiction and fantasy apart from other genres is the capacity for symbolism. You know as soon as Darth Vader walks onto screen in Star Wars that he’s the bad guy; just look at him! For an active mind, it’s fun to try and decode the design work in these kinds of films, though you’re as likely reading into it your own ideas as deciphering the filmmakers’. That revelatory aspect is the essence of any art, but for some reason it comes across most strongly to me in science-fiction and fantasy films.


What I respond to in anything is quality of craft and ingenuity of storytelling. I appreciate most those flights of imagination that transcend expectation and broaden my horizons. I like to have lots of spectacle on screen, which science fiction and fantasy excel at, but I also want to care about why the characters are in conflict, which is where they fall short a lot of the time. When they work, though, there’s nothing as good. I am a devotee of science fiction and fantasy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: Blade Runner 2049

Denis Villeneuve has succeeded in creating that rarest of films: a very late sequel that respects and improves upon the original. Blade Runner 2049 expands the canvas of the first film with new locations and characters, all of whom feel authentic and true to the tone and themes of 1982’s Blade Runner . I thought it was magnificent in terms of setting and imagery and it packed an unexpected emotional punch which was absent in the first movie. I wanted to see it twice before I wrote my review and I am confident in saying it is superior to the original film while remaining tonally and esthetically consistent. I loved it. Foremost, I loved the story – complex without being hard to follow and never violating any continuity laid down by its predecessor. There were plot twists I could see coming but then the revelation would have more dimension than I was expecting. There were also genuine surprises in a couple of scenes. The cast is wonderful, with everyone well-suited to their roles (...

Oscars

For the first time that I can remember, I have seen all but one of the nominees for the Oscars, which were held last week. At the time, I had seen all of them except for The Post and The Shape of Water , which I finally saw after it won best picture. My thoughts on it and the rest of the nominees: The Shape of Water is essentially Splash re-imagined with the Creature from the Black Lagoon instead of a mermaid, but nowhere near as good. I was impressed by the creature design, certainly, but the rest of the movie felt frustratingly underdone. It was a very typical Guillermo del Toro film, in that sense: I think he’s a gifted visualist, but his stories and characters leave a lot to be desired. Get Out is actually my third favourite movie of 2018, behind mother! and Blade Runner 2049 , so if I had been an Academy voter, this is the one I personally would have chosen for best picture. It’s very smart, very funny and very poignant without being preachy. It’s really brilliant,...

IPO Statement

This weekly blog is intended (like most people’s) to be a space where I can talk about the things I’m interested in. I’ll be using it to post critical reviews of movies, books and whatever else I might want to unload my mind about. In general, I’m going to keep things as positive as I can because there’s already enough negativity out there and I would rather spend time focusing on the things I like rather than the things that upset me. I am a rational anarchist. I believe nobody has any right to tell anyone else what to do, but that the limits of anarchy make it unworkable in groups larger than a hundred or so individuals. I think with this many people around, impersonal rules are an unfortunate necessity, but I will only respect the ones that seem fair, in my mind. There is no excuse for injustice or abuse of power and as people and populations change, so must the rules that govern us, meaning they should always be challenged or at least suspected. Art and culture are my pass...