Skip to main content

Review - Ready Player One


The latest from Steven Spielberg is a sci-fi film based on the novel of the same name by Ernest Cline. I thought it was spectacular by unsatisfying, with an overabundance of 80’s nostalgia to distract from the weak characterizations and story which all gets a bit boring after a while, though the early parts are a lot of fun. I’d say your enjoyment of it will depend greatly on your familiarity with 80’s pop culture.

By the mid-21st century, virtual reality sophistication has grown so great that people can escape their mundane reality for the limitless glamour of these digital realms. The biggest and most popular is the Oasis and upon the death of its creator a treasure hunt is launched for the keys to the kingdom: the winner becomes the majority shareholder of the company stock. It’s Willy Wonka by way of The Matrix.

Tye Sheridan plays Wade, a standard everyman/nobody/unlikely hero, and Ben Mendelsohn is Sorrento, the corporate shark out to win at any cost, employing hundreds of players to get the keys for him. There are other forces at work, such as a group of revolutionaries who want to stop the corporatization of the virtual realm, but the cliché set-up and predictability of the pay-off made the second half of the movie a bit tedious for me and that’s all I really remember.

The action sequences are great fun and have the magic Spielberg touch that lets you know exactly where you are at any cut. I do love the man for his clarity of geography and I really enjoyed the opening car race. However, the real-world physics of the film were so incongruent and inconsistent that I got rather annoyed. Unlike in The Matrix where entering the VR world puts you in a real-world trance, here we have a ludicrous interactivity between real and VR that is so wildly inconsistent it made me angry. For but one example, during the big war inside the Oasis in the third act we see people running around in the real world wearing VR headsets and miming out the actions they are taking in the Oasis, but the real world has buildings and cars and other people that don’t match the VR world, so why aren’t they running into walls?

Also, the real-world is so poorly fleshed out that I really didn’t understand what the stakes were. I had no sense of government authority until the cops suddenly showed up at the end to arrest the bad guy which just landed with a thud for me. None of the characters seemed to have any depth or authenticity, just playing out parts expected of them by the story, but I do have to say I enjoyed Ben Mendelsohn who is always wonderful, even playing a two-dimensional villain.

Ready Player One  is okay. I don’t think it’s bad, but its better parts are weighed down by its failings. A fun diversion if you are a fan of 80’s pop culture, but not much more reason to see it than that, in my opinion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Retro Review - Paris, Texas (1984)

As a preteen I was obsessed with ALIEN and always took note of everyone involved, including the actors. Harry Dean Stanton’s most oft-mentioned film credits were always either ALIEN or Paris, Texas , so when he died last year I made a point of finally hunting down the latter which had been on my radar as long as my obsession with the former. I knew very little about the film, so when the opening credits said “written by Sam Shepard” I immediately became more interested. Then “directed by Wim Wenders” came up on screen and I was even more interested. I was pretty confident I was going to have a very good film experience. I was wrong only in that it exceeded my expectations. Paris, Texas is, in my opinion, beautiful, authentic, heart-felt, compassionate, moving and very mature: a great movie, in other words. The movie opens with Travis (Harry Dean Stanton) walking aimlessly through the deserts of Texas, apparently in some kind of mute daze. A local doctor finds him and a bus...

Film Review - A Quiet Place

John Krasinski directs and stars with his wife Emily Blunt in this exceptional horror movie about a family trying to survive against predatory monsters who hunt by sound. The film is a terrific example of visual storytelling as the dialogue is suppressed to a minimum by the danger it represents to the survivors. It is also one of the most effective and high-tension suspense movies I’ve ever seen, with more intelligence and emotional power than are typical of the genre. The story begins several months after some sort of invasion by ill-defined, poorly understood but immensely superior predators which have effectively wiped out the human race. Those who have managed to survive have had to adapt to a virtually silent mode of living, walking barefoot everywhere, for example, or communicating by sign language. The eldest daughter, played by Millicent Simmonds, is indeed deaf herself, and the film uses its sound design very effectively to convey point of view of characters according to...

Film Review - Tomb Raider

Alicia Vikander is the best and possibly only reason to see this movie. I’m not expecting Shakespeare from a film based on a video game, but I am expecting more action than dialogue. I liked the action sequences alright, but I don’t think there were enough of them, and the stuff between them I felt was kind of boring. Still, I did like seeing Alicia Vikander running and jumping and doing action-stuff, so the movie wasn’t a complete loss. I just wouldn’t recommend it. The film sets out to be an origin story for Lara Croft and a search for her lost father which is bound up in a lame Raiders of the Lost Ark –type race for a powerful magical maguffin. I really don’t mind the predictability of the plot, and there is an argument to be made that these kinds of movies are all about delivering what the audience expects, but I don’t want to put up with long, melodramatic scenes or boring expository speeches. I want to see Lara Croft raiding tombs. Alicia Vikander does a superb job wit...